However, I find it ironic for an organization that prides itself on the ethical treatment of animals to disregard the one animal they seem to be mistreating the most: human beings. The lack of respect PETA has shown to the female body is just as insulting as the meat industry's.
Examples:
Examples:
The most obvious thing to note between all of these pictures is the focus on what's deemed "attractive" by PETA. Like the meat industry, PETA also equates meat and other animal byproducts with images of women. In this case, however, the additive offense stems from the amount of body-shaming these ads illustrate.
Since society has deemed hair on women's body unattractive, PETA decides to equate that with the fur-pelting of animals. I think their thought process in that one was that women would see these ads and think: "Yeah! I hate having my own hair on my body so why do I want the fur of an animal's, instead, am I right!?!?" I also don't think I have to highlight the fat-shaming in these ads, either. Through these images alone, PETA seems to think that the only way women can be proud of their bodies is if they are thin -- and the only way to be thin is to stop eating meat altogether and go vegetarian! It's not like it has anything to do with a healthy diet and exercise or anything and it's not like women who don't meet these standards can't be proud of their body, anyhow.
Anyway, these are just a few of the ads I've compiled that focus on body-shaming. Other offensive ads you can come across involve things like this:
(P.S. I hope my sarcasm comes across clearly through my writing).
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThese pictures are honestly quite surprising to me. I have never seen them myself, but i'm glad you brought it up on here. Its hard to believe PETA has chosen to take this approach, targeting women in this way. It's almost worse the way that they're doing it too, because unlike the Carl's Jr. advertisement that we examined early this quarter, PETA doesn't leave much room for the imagination or for analysis to be done. They lay it all plainly out there for the public to view and are quite blunt about it, but their bluntness is not attractive and i don't believe the message is coming across too well. I've always wondered why PETA has taken this approach, as i has only been exposed to their celebrity nude ad campaigns. It's never made much sense to me why they choose to do so, but in a way it makes sense—they do it to get attention, much like what most advertisement in the media do. It's to get the audience to react in some way. In that case, i think they have succeeded.
ReplyDelete